Cost object
A cost object is the reference unit of cost accounting that "bears" the costs incurred — usually a product, an order or a service. Cost object accounting determines what costs are incurred for and what a single product costs.
A cost object is the unit in cost and management accounting to which incurred costs are allocated — loosely put, the object that ultimately "bears" the costs. In most companies this is a single product, a product group, a customer order, a project or a service. Cost object accounting thus answers the question "What were the costs incurred for?" and determines what it actually costs to manufacture or deliver a specific output. It forms the third and final stage of classic cost accounting — after cost type accounting and cost center accounting.
The cost object is the counterpart to the cost center: while the cost center describes where in the business costs arise (for example in production, purchasing or shipping), the cost object describes what they arise for. Cost object accounting charges the overhead costs collected on the cost centers, together with the directly attributable direct costs, onto the products. Only this makes it possible to reliably determine the unit cost of goods, calculated selling prices, contribution margins and the profitability of individual products or orders.
At a glance
- Reference unit of cost accounting that bears costs: usually a product, order or service
- Answers "What are costs incurred for?" — the counterpart to the cost center ("Where?")
- Third stage of cost accounting, after cost type and cost center accounting
- Provides the unit cost of goods, a basis for costing and contribution margins
- Held as its own object in the ERP and linked to orders, projects and items
How cost object accounting works
Cost object accounting builds on the preceding stages. First, cost type accounting records which costs were incurred at all (materials, personnel, depreciation and so on). Cost center accounting then distributes the overhead costs to the areas where they were caused. In the final step, cost object accounting charges these costs onto the outputs: direct costs such as production materials or piece-rate wages are allocated directly to the cost object, while overheads are distributed proportionally via overhead rates, allocation rates or reference bases.
In principle, any marketable output can serve as a cost object — a physical product as much as a service, a construction project or a single order. A common distinction is made between sales cost objects (outputs that are sold) and internal cost objects (such as self-produced equipment or tools used within the company itself). How finely cost objects are defined depends on the information needed: from the individual item to an entire product line.
Unit costing and period costing of cost objects
Cost object accounting has two forms. Unit costing of the cost object — classic product costing — determines the unit cost of goods per piece or per order and serves as the basis for pricing; this is also referred to as pre-costing, interim costing and post-costing. Period costing of the cost object (operating profit calculation), by contrast, looks at all cost objects of a period together and contrasts costs and revenues, for example using the total-cost or the cost-of-sales method. Together the two show what a product costs and whether the product portfolio is profitable overall.
Why cost objects matter
Without sound cost object accounting, a company lacks the answer to one of the most important business questions: does a product make money or not? Only when direct and overhead costs are allocated to the individual outputs on a cause-and-effect basis can you see which items, orders or customer groups contribute to earnings and which weigh them down. This is the basis for price calculation, product-range decisions, make-or-buy analyses and the assessment of quotes.
For mid-sized businesses this has immediate practical consequences. Anyone who only looks at total revenue can easily overlook the fact that individual products sell below their cost of goods despite high sales volumes. Cost object accounting reveals such cases and makes contribution margins visible — that is, the amount a product contributes, after deducting variable costs, toward covering fixed costs and generating profit. This turns the cost object from an accounting construct into a management tool.
Distinction: cost object vs. cost center and cost type
The three basic concepts of cost accounting answer different questions and are easily confused. The cost type answers "Which costs were incurred?" (material, personnel, capital costs). The cost center answers "Where were they incurred?" — that is, in which business area. The cost object answers "What were they incurred for?" — for which product or output. The three stages build on one another: from recording, through spatial allocation, to attribution to the output.
The distinction from the general ledger account in financial accounting also matters: the general ledger account serves external accounting (balance sheet, income statement) under commercial and tax law, whereas the cost object serves internal accounting (controlling), which can be designed freely and aims at management. A cost object is not an account in the chart of accounts but an additional allocation dimension by which costs are grouped for analysis.
The cost object in the ERP system
In an ERP system the cost object is usually a stand-alone master-data object with a number and a label, maintained in parallel to financial accounting. With every relevant posting — material withdrawal, production confirmation, invoice, time tracking — a cost object can be added alongside the general ledger account and the cost center. Costs thus accumulate automatically on the right object without a separate subsidiary ledger having to be kept. Reports then show the accumulated costs per cost object, often compared with planned or costing values.
How deeply cost object accounting is implemented varies greatly by system. Some ERP solutions offer full-fledged cost accounting with overhead costing and operating profit calculation, while others limit themselves to a simple cost object dimension for reporting. For many mid-sized businesses it is enough to use orders or projects as cost objects and let the actual costs run against them. Examples of systems with cost accounting of varying depth can be found under "Related systems".
Posting cost objects to orders and projects
In practice, customer orders, production orders or projects are often defined as cost objects in the ERP. All transactions belonging to that order — purchased materials, booked working hours, proportional machine costs — are posted to the object and accumulated there. At the end there is a post-costing that contrasts the actually incurred costs with the planned costs and the revenues achieved. This lets a business see, per order, whether the costing worked out, and price future quotes more realistically.
Cost objects in the DACH region and in practice
The three-stage cost accounting with cost types, cost centers and cost objects is a business standard in German-speaking countries and part of every commercial training. Unlike financial accounting, cost accounting is not legally required — it serves internal management alone and can be designed freely accordingly. In practice, many companies use the framework supported by the DATEV or SKR chart of accounts, but extend it with their own cost object and cost center keys.
For retail and e-commerce, items or item groups are the typical cost objects; in manufacturing they are products and production orders; for service providers they are projects or service orders. The key is to choose the cost object structure neither too fine nor too coarse: too many cost objects create maintenance effort without added insight, too few obscure which output is really profitable. A well-thought-out structure, cleanly maintained in the ERP, is therefore the basis of a meaningful profit calculation.
Example
Example: cost object accounting at a furniture manufacturer
A mid-sized furniture manufacturer defines each model of its product line as a separate cost object — for example the "Nora dining table model". For a production order of 50 tables, the ERP posts the directly attributable direct costs (wood, fittings, piece-rate wages) straight to this cost object. The overhead costs from the cutting, assembly and paint-shop cost centers are charged proportionally via overhead rates.
At the end of the order, the post-costing shows a unit cost of goods of 210 euros per table. At a selling price of 349 euros, a healthy contribution margin remains. A second model, by contrast, turns out in the same analysis to be a loss-maker: its actual cost of goods exceeds the list price. Without cost object accounting this would have been lost in total revenue — but this way the manufacturer can adjust the price or drop the model from the range.
Frequently asked questions
Matching ERP systems
Related services
Sources
Questions about Cost object in your ERP project?
We advise vendor-neutrally – and implement it ourselves on request.